
Another significant challenge is that there is not television show to see the races every night. In addition, there is no replay machine like there is at the Meadowlands, allowing you to see any race from the meet to give another look at a given race. The bottom line on it is that while I do not change my methods, so to speak, you may have to shuffle the weighting of the factors a bit. The flow of cover is more irregular with the lower level horses. Further, on a mile track, when cheaper horses are overused and expire, the result is often much worse than it appears, making for what might appear to be more wild form swings. Finally, without visual confirmation being as available, it puts a big premium on your ability to read a chart, and your willingness to spend time with the charts. As I do at the Meadowlands, as the meet begins and develops, I keep an eye out for certain horses who, from my experience, seems to gain a competitive advantage upon the move to Garden from the Meadowlands. Some of the young horses we may not know about, but there are several who have demonstrated to me that they like the surface, race well at this particular time of the year, and who seem to reach their sharpest part of their cycle at this track some time during the meet. In alphabetical order, some of the key horses who I expect to be significantly more effective at Garden State are:
This is not an all-inclusive list
just the major horses who may
have appeared dull at the Meadowlands, but who, when sharp, should have
more than there share of winning opportunities. A few look to benefit immediately
from the switch. Others will still have to show other signs of moving into
shape before we look to play them. |